News

Court Dismisses Burundi Case Challenging Election Of 4th EALA Speaker 

The First Instance Division dismissed a case filed by the government of Burundi challenging the process of electing the Speaker of the 4th East African Legislative Assembly (EALA), which was carried out on 19th December.

According to the Court, the case at hand gravitated around EALA’s compliance with the legal regime applicable to the election of Speaker thereof.

The Court stated that the bone of contention between the parties was what (if any) was the quorum of the House for purposes of the election of a Speaker. It opined that such matter depicted a question of fact that must be established by cogent evidence.

Dr. Anthony Kafumbe introducing the parties in court to receive judgment.

During the hearing session in March 2019, Mr. Nestor Kayobera representing Burundi (the Applicant) argued that elections that were held in the absence of EALA MPs from Burundi and Tanzania in violation of the fundamental Principles of the Community under Articles 6 (d), 7 and 57 (1) and Rule 12 (1) of EALA Rules of Procedure.

Mr. Kayobera further told the Court that the election of the Speaker of EALA is governed by the EAC Treaty and the Assembly’s Rules of procedure and that Article 9 (4) of the Treaty obligates Organs and Institutions of the Community to perform the functions and act within the limits of the powers conferred upon them by the Treaty.

Mr. Kayobera also contended that the issue of quorum is a Treaty obligation under Article 57 and rule 12 (1) of EALA Rules of Procedure which provides that: “The quorum of the House or of the Committee of the Whole House shall be half of the elected Members and such quorum shall be composed of at least one third of the elected Members from each Partner State.”

He further argued that violation of the rule on quorum entails violation of the Treaty.

He contended that the Speaker of EALA was not elected in accordance with the Treaty and the Rules of the Assembly and therefore asked the Court to order a new election in accordance with the Treaty and rules of the Assembly.

Loading...

Dr Anthony Kafumbe, who is the Counsel to the Community, representing the Secretary General (Respondent), on his part, submitted that the election of the Speaker was done under Part III of the Rules of Procedure of the Assembly.

He further told the court that under Part III of the EALA Rules of Procedure, Rule 6 (9) (c) on the election of the Speaker, it is not mandatory for every member to vote, hence the Members of Burundi and Tanzania had liberty not to vote.

He also argued that the issue of quorum does not apply, that it only applies when the house is duly constituted.

EALA MPs, EAC members of staff, media and others in court to hear the judgment.

He therefore submitted that there was no illegal election process, that the Speaker was elected under the relevant provisions of the Rules of Procedure of the Assembly and that the election process did not violate the Treaty.

Dr. Kafumbe further submitted that as Article 9 of the Treaty obligates the Organs and Institutions of the Community, the Assembly acted within its mandate and in accordance with its rules of procedure.

Dr. Kafumbe also contended that Members of the Assembly have accepted the Speaker and a lot of business is going on and therefore, it would not be helpful to nullify the election and order a fresh election.

The Intervener, Hon. Fred Mukasa Mbidde, represented by Mr Donald Deya, Mr. Justin Semuyaba and Mr Nelson Ndeki during the hearing in court, associated their submissions with the Respondent and asked the Court not to grant the orders sought by the Applicants.

The Judgment was delivered by the Honourable Judges: Lady Justice Monica Mugenyi (Principle Judge), Justice Dr Faustin Ntezilyayao (Deputy Principal Judge), Justice Fakihi A. Jundu, Justice Dr Charles Nyawello and Justice Charles Nyachae.

 

 

Tags
Back to top button
Translate »

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker