recipe http://danceexchange.org/wp-content/themes/danceexchange/past-events.php geneva; font-size: small;”>Ethics and Integrity Minister Simon Lokodo says much as government and especially the Prime Minister do not fully support the Bill that seeks severe punishments for aggravated homosexuality, viagra “it’s required under our constitution to facilitate the debate.”
health geneva;”>Lokodo further clarifies the Bill was proposed by a Member of Parliament David Bahati, saying “it does not form part of the government’s legislative programme and it does not enjoy the support of the Prime Minister or the Cabinet.”
The international media has developed overwhelming interest in the Bill.
Bahati says the proposed law seeks to protect minors from being seduced into homosexual acts, protect the traditional family setting and human race from extinction.
Religious leaders and legislators in Uganda fully support the Bill.
The Bill was re-introduced to Parliament on Tuesday. Legislators cheered, saying its passing is long overdue.
Bahati says the death penalty clause will be amended; a clear signal the Bill will easily get the legislators’ nod.
Pro-gay activists say homosexuality is a human right that must be respected.
President Barrack Obama recently labeled the Bill “odious” while UK Premier David Cameron has since threatened to cut aid if the Bill is passed.
But several top government officials say Uganda will soon be dependent when oil revenue starts trickling in.
Below is the full statement, signed by Lokodo.
Uganda has today been the subject of mass international criticism as a result of the debate on the Anti-Homosexual Bill at parliament.
What many of these critics fail to convey is the bill itself was introduced by a back bencher.
It does not form part of the government’s legislative programme and it does not enjoy the support of the Prime Minister or the Cabinet.
However as Uganda is a constitutional democracy, it is appropriate that if a private members bill is presented to parliament it be debated.
Cultural attitudes in Africa are very different to elsewhere in world, 2/3 of African countries outlaw homosexual activity and 80% of east African countries criminalize it.
Whilst on a global level more than 80 countries outlaw homosexual acts. Contrary to reports, the bill before parliament even if it were to pass, would not sanction the death penalty for homosexual behavior in Uganda.
Many international governments and politicians, who have criticized Uganda for debating this private members bill, remain mute in the face of far graver and far more draconian legislation relating to homosexuality in other countries.
One might ask for example, if Uganda enjoyed as close a relationship with the US and European countries as Saudi Arabia (which sentences homosexuals to corporate and capital punishment) would we have attracted the same opprobrium as a result of allowing this parliamentary debate?
Unlike many other countries, no one in Uganda has ever been charged with the criminal offence of homosexuality.
Moreover the main provisions of this bill were designed to stem the issue of defilement and rape which in the minds of Ugandan’s is a more pressing and urgent matter that needs to be addressed.
As a parliamentary democracy this process of debate will continue. Whilst the government of Uganda does not support this bill, it is required under our constitution to facilitate this debate.
The facilitation of this debate should not be confused for the governments support for this bill.